In this episode of Applying AI, Mike Walsh from EXL and Manny Plasencia from TransUnion explain why accurate and updated data in collections is the foundation of successful AI strategies. The discussion explores how data decay impacts AI decision making, why AI acts as an amplifier of both good and bad data, and how organizations can improve data quality for AI decisioning models.
Adam Parks (00:05)
Hello, everybody. Welcome to Applying AI, the show where we cut through the hype and get real about using artificial intelligence in regulated industries. Season one of Applying AI is presented by Receivables Info and sponsored by EXL. So let's dive in. So this being our second episode of the Applying AI series, co-hosting here with Mr. Mike Walsh from EXL, because we have so many great conversations about artificial intelligence and actually being able to use it. not just theoretically. And so as part of the challenges that I think the debt collection industry faces when it comes to artificial intelligence is AI is an amplifier and it's either going to amplify good results or bad results. And that's why I think that the data that we feed into these models and systems is going to be mission critical in regards to the success of deploying these tools.
And so we asked Manny Plasencia to join us from TransUnion because he's an operator and because he is looking at all of that data and trying to better understand how it can be used across the debt collection industry for agencies, debt buyers, law firms, and creditors. So gentlemen, thank you both so much for joining today. I really appreciate you coming on, sharing your insights. I'm excited for today's discussion.
Mike Walsh (01:23)
absolutely.
Manny Plasencia (01:24)
Yeah, thanks. Thanks for having me, Adam. I know we've, we've, geeked out on various topics along the AI line and, ⁓ I'm looking forward to diving in here.
Adam Parks (01:32)
So I think one of the interesting things where I thought I would kind of kick off the conversation is around the idea of AI being an amplifier. if we're calling out voice AI, if we're sending emails, if we're sending text messages, we can look at artificial intelligence from a few different perspectives, whether it be the content, the channel management, the coordination across multi-channels. And so there's a lot of different things that we can use it for, but...
Mike Walsh (01:40)
you
Adam Parks (01:58)
As we amplify our ability to communicate at scale, mean, if we're sending to, if we're calling bad phone numbers, we're going to call a lot of bad phone numbers. If we're sending emails to bad addresses, we're going to do that at scale and it's going to happen quick. So as much as there's opportunity for us to grow and to learn and to increase our tool usage, it also comes with a challenge and a threat. So like, what have you seen? as you've been helping organizations deploy these tools across the space.
Mike Walsh (02:31)
So it's, you're right. It's an engaged, like the main AI that people talk about, let's just put that out there to clarify is right, is, is engagement, right? Not, scoring or, or, or QA, but I mean, the push right now is this is a better way to engage customers. It's faster, cheaper, easier, better customer experience. Let's just use this, this, these engagement tools to the math. Right. I think.
Why we have Manny here is not just running into bad data versus good data, but also enhancing data, using enhanced data. Where do we go with that? And then using data efficiently and right. And then figuring out data points that are predictive and become part of our new strategy. Like to me, this is the changing of collection strategy, just like email and text change collection strategy a few years ago.
AI is going to give you data that helps you use those tools or is using those tools way better than a human could. But as you said, without people like Manny giving us good data or his clients giving us that data to use, we may be sending a lot of emails, virtual agent phone calls into outer space, into a cloud that goes nowhere. Like nowhere. So. I mean, the beauty of AI is you'll find out if you have bad data pretty quick. It's not, it is not, it does not take long. And we do find some really funny data. Like no.com email addresses or even curse words. But you know, a lot of the challenge we run into is as an engine or as a tool for clients is it's their data, Me as an AI engagement tool, it's not my data. I'm like a dealer for engagement, but it's up to agencies, creditors, debt buyers to make the decisions on how to use their data, what they're comfortable using. And I think that's a big discussion that a lot of people are not having.
Adam Parks (04:28)
But it's also about the decaying value of data over time. So Manny, talk to me a little bit about the value of data over time.
Manny Plasencia (04:37)
Yeah, absolutely. Look, we're in it. First off, let me start out by saying we're an industry that's been primed for AI, especially if you think about the way our industry has grown and the way that we've utilized tools, not just to comply with the, gosh, the growing landscape of compliance and regulation that we dealt with as an industry, but also trying to grow from the what the industry was to the industry is and trying to meet consumers and expectations of the consumers, whether it be communication or payment, whatever it is. That's all evolved along with how we communicate and AI is here to stay. I mean, think we discovered that what 73 % of companies in 2024 were reviewing or exploring AI, now 93 % are there. mean, yeah, I understand it.
Adam Parks (05:19)
Yeah.
Mike Walsh (05:20)
My favorite stat ever, manny.
Manny Plasencia (05:25)
And to your point, Mike, defining AI in your strategy is key. I think, you know, I get excited about AI and I've used this term before. I tell Adam all the time. Yeah, look, this is the new frontier. Everybody's excited about it. I'm excited about all the pioneers exploring this space because data is the new gold and I'm a data guy. So it excites me obviously in the opportunities. I've been working closely with Adam, you and everybody else in this industry to understand applications, use cases and position TransUnion strongly to be able to support that. One of the key identifying factors that we utilize to explore performance is data decay. The integrity of your data decays year over year, month over month. Behaviors change, people move, addresses change. I get a new job, I make more money, I lose a job, I have less money, family change. There are so many life events that change over the course of time that impact the data that maybe your creditor you're relying on coming from a creditor or maybe you're even a secondary or tertiary agency. And at this point, you're trying to utilize that data to try to contact somebody or segment somebody somewhere or another. And we've experienced that on a manual, in manual operations. Then as we move towards automation and to your point, Mike, this is the new evolution. It's not a trick, it's not a toy, it's the new evolution. And my fear is, and what I've seen is, What was the stat that you and I talked about? It 30 something odd percent of decaying debt. 36. Thank you.
Adam Parks (06:52)
36 % year over year data decays. And so if we think about how old the data is that we're dealing with from the creditor, the email address may be from the original origination. Then you have to consider delinquency timeframe, charge off timeframe. If it's coming to me as a primary, secondary, tertiary agency, I might be three years behind.
Manny Plasencia (07:11)
And I have a unique, I want to say opportunity here at TransUnion because we're a credit bureau. It's not just that we're fortunate enough to have all our clients both on both sides of the house, right? Collections, as well as originations, creditors, we all work together in one big environment, which is very unique. I know we're the only one of the bureaus that has dedicated third party collections. And we try to create those silos, but they're all under one pillar, if you would. And having all of that data, And how it circulates really, I mean, some of it they have to share, right? We have to share as a Bureau. So it really gives us a unique lens, Mike. I know we were having this conversation about which clients share and don't. I really don't have the same challenges that others might face in getting clients to share data because they're usually, you know, obtaining or sharing data from us. So we really try to create those bi-directional relationships with all of our clients, whether it be, you know, in the financial services side, our side to be able to create those data shares. And we're constantly testing. We're constantly testing to see what the next.
Mike Walsh (08:06)
Yeah,
Manny Plasencia (08:07)
innovation is, et cetera, et
Mike Walsh (08:07)
it's interesting. Me and Manny, that's interesting because too, like EXL right? We're not just the backend collections, right? Like we're making models for marketing. I mean, we use a ton of your data, right? And some of it's for marketing purposes, some of it is for modeling purposes. It's throughout the entire lending decisions, its entire life cycle. But that just, you know, when you get to like our product, like payment or we don't have access to all
Manny Plasencia (08:14)
I know. Thank you.
Mike Walsh (08:34)
we get what, who is on the other end deciding to give us. And we do try to restrict that data because, you know, security reasons, everything else. But it's interesting because we've had creditors share, you know, TransUnion data and creditors not. And we don't really, you know, what your data.
Manny Plasencia (08:43)
course.
Mike Walsh (08:53)
And because exactly what Adam was saying, decay happens and it happens quick. Like put yourself into a person who owes a lot of money and maybe it was a medical reason, right? They didn't even lose their job, but they're behind or maybe they lost their job and now they got a new job, but they're still behind and they're trying to catch up. That phone is ringing. It's ringing a lot. They're getting texts. They're going to, they might just say, forget it. I'm getting a new number. I don't care. I'll drop off my friends.
My friends could find my new text. I'll get back in. Right? Like it's a pain in the neck, but let's face it. Your cell phone is now your digital signature. Like it is not. It's not just a phone anymore. That is, you know, we're looking at the IP address on it. We're looking at all this information on it. So they might just bail out on it to save themselves some pain of, of fielding phone calls and everything else. So data is.
Mike Walsh (09:45)
People are choosing to deteriorate their data or it's just like you said, aging, right? Do you see an increase in that because of the size of the debt? Like, do you see like phone number skipping going up or anything like that? Or people shifting their email?
Manny Plasencia (09:50)
Well.
Adam Parks (10:01)
So hold on, Mandy, let me drop something in here because at the TransUnion Summit last year, we saw a presentation where they talked about the average consumer having four to five email addresses. And so that I think is a, that's a pretty significant challenge there. Like four to five email addresses.
Mike Walsh (10:11)
Yeah.
Adam Parks (10:17)
when I heard it, I like almost fell out of my chair.
Manny Plasencia (10:19)
Yeah, thanks for that Adam. That's a great segue. Five email addresses. I personally, I have more than that. I have an email address just for my Uber receipts. All of my Uber receipts go to this one email address because I, know, expense reports, we all deal with that, Different behaviors, And if I be, I'm gonna get on my soapbox for a second, right? But back in 1995,
Mike Walsh (10:28)
High five.
Manny Plasencia (10:42)
If my behaviors were limited to who I called, who I texted maybe, and how I paid my bills, that's it. Today, it's who I talk to, how I use my phone, how many emails, how many text messages, how I utilize all of that. And the trick is all of that's changed. It works congruently now. I keep trying to tell people, stop looking at the channels and look at the mobility. I carry this thing with me everywhere I go.
So every channel you use today is being launched at me instantly. Right then and there, I'm seeing it. My behavior is telling you something. If I'm not picking up your phone call, it's probably because I don't pick up phone numbers and you're trying to trick me with the local Annie and stuff like that. you should be able to decision that very early in your contact attempts so that you change that behavior, whether it's branding the call, whether it's branding some calls, whether it's using your 800 number, I don't know, but whatever behavior you identify challenge that problem and that's where I think e-commerce has really met the customer right they follow the breadcrumbs to the behavior not to the solution they want they'd follow to the behavior and adapt to the customers behavior so think about phone calls Mike's when's the last time you answered a phone number you didn't recognize
Mike Walsh (11:53)
I love doing it, I'm not, Adam has a workstation for his family. I'm a lunatic who loves spam calls,
Manny Plasencia (11:54)
So the purpose of the phone call.
Adam Parks (11:58)
Never.
Mike Walsh (12:01)
normal use case here.
Manny Plasencia (12:01)
You're one of the 2 % that does. You're one of the
Adam Parks (12:04)
Yeah
Manny Plasencia (12:06)
2.34 % RPC rates of people who call. And you obviously probably don't owe anybody any money and aren't avoiding any phone calls and you're trying to gain prospects. I have no clue, but you have a strange behavior if you're answering phone numbers because 90 some odd percent of people who aren't dead, I would say, because these are collection agency statistics. No, I'm sorry.
I'm correct. These aren't collection agency statistics. are context statistics from my, my contact folks. So 90, I'll say 90 some odd, cause I don't like to be specific. Folks aren't answering phone numbers. You know, so I, I'm not trying to, you know, get on my high horse around about branded call display I'm just trying to say that behaviors overall and the way that we use contact channels, the way they've changed immensely, they've changed immensely over time. And it makes us more rapid to respond to each one of those types of behaviors. Go ahead, I'm sorry.
Adam Parks (12:55)
No, branded call display is something that I wanted to go back to because I think from a data perspective, one of the objectives that we have as debt collectors is building digital trust. Whether we're sending MMS messages that have branding and then we're building our campaigns between MMS and SMS because SMS was just built to be a notification tool set, not necessarily a branded tool set. But as we're using all of these channels, we can send 10 million calls from an AI voice chat bot out to the portfolio of accounts that were working. But if we're not leveraging some of these additional digital trust tools like a branded call display, how are we actively getting through? I don't answer the phone, I've got three different spam filters on my cell phone to restrict as much as humanly possible.
Mike Walsh (13:44)
I think this is where AI comes in. Because as Manny said before, behavior is king to me. AI is using everything and it's not siloed, right? It's combining every outreach you can. And even we're using things that aren't used in the US, you know, like not just WhatsApp, but other messenger services all over the world. Like, so we. They give us a preview of like what RCS is going to be, where branding is a little bit more available in text messaging. But if you use them together and they're under one centralized intelligence and data is feeding in on, hey, he ignored this text, but opened his email or the other way around. Then I can generate ways. If it's, let's say it's a HELOC, right? It's a Big balance. It's probably not going to be negotiated out on a text message, but I can use text and email to drive an inbound call. So now the strategy, you know, I've had agencies or creditors say, Hey, this is big balance, it is never going to work. And I'm like, would you like more engagement? Back to the beginning, the data feeds the engagement tool, which feeds your strategy and your strategy is going to change. This is.
Manny Plasencia (14:41)
There you go.
Mike Walsh (14:58)
Just like it changed five years ago, just like it changed with the telephone collections is not second. It's a very old business. I'll put it like that. And it is not the same as it used to be. And this is, it is changing and it's changing very quickly. And the tech is data led and it is you're using data now to make changes to your strategy. And it's going to get.
What I tell clients is phone, email, texts, together, you're going to now segment out behaviors to work on behaviors. And the example I always give is I went to the payment portal, I spent three minutes because I'm tracking it. Spent three minutes there, left. No payment, nothing. No response, nothing. That is not your typical next day phone call. That is someone who tried, right? Like that behavior is they tried, they made an effort and that's someone you should concentrate on. And I think we're going to get, when you look at all these different behaviors that are going to happen and we track now, and you're going to use AI to track and help you make decisions, your strategy is totally different. But it goes back to that data, right? Like you need to be able to reach these people. You need to be able to measure this stuff.
Manny Plasencia (16:13)
Well, think, know, it's too big, right? If you look at trying to get people to do what you're describing, you imagine the size of the staff and how many decisions you're trying to make it one by one. You can't write. So AI is the most effective way. Yeah.
Mike Walsh (16:20)
Thank you. Adam can probably do it. Adam can probably do it overnight. He'd stand up, take his baby, working like a mini-nag. But no, no human being can do that.
Adam Parks (16:29)
Sure build something, but...
Manny Plasencia (16:31)
You think of it. Like I remember back in, in, at green sky, ⁓ which was a Goldman Sachs company. We were, we were trying to figure out, ⁓ channel choice, right. And, and that I'll just be transparent back then I'll get FICO plug. used a FICO CCS and we, you know, for me, it was, okay, I'm going to install this tool. It's going to make all these great decisions. I'm good to go. What I didn't realize was me and my team were have to, to have to, going to go and, plug in every single yes, no in that decision tree to give me the outputs and work for, and to send things down the workflows result based, right? And that was like a six month endeavor of just, you know, pulling my hair out of my head. That's how I got this gray, if you don't know. But it was also one of the most useful exercises I've ever been through because now I understood exactly what every behavior, to Mike's point,
Mike Walsh (17:18)
Thank
Manny Plasencia (17:25)
And I realized this is way too big. If there's a way to really automate this, I'd be so much more successful because I can make these decisions in real time and apply them to individual accounts rather than cohorts. And that's what AI can do for you is it could take all of these types of behaviors and say, okay, went to the empty cart in the portal, three attempts with an Annie, a local Annie two text messages sent, an email sent, what's the next step? Whatever your decision and your strategy is. And they could decide that for you on multiple scale across 40 million records at once. you're gonna pay, I don't know, a minuscule portion of, I mean, the ROI is a fricking incredible on product, right? I think what was the satisfaction rate? was, no, 98 % of firms were reporting some type of level of satisfaction high or mid-high satisfaction with AI adoption and what they've adopted over the last year. It's incredible. It's an incredible opportunity for our industry to really take on and especially our mid-size. I keep saying this, our mid-size to smaller partners can now compete on a larger scale because they don't necessarily have to throw a hundred FTE and go through all of these things to build these types of strategies. I'll get off my soapbox.
Adam Parks (18:41)
No, it makes a lot of sense. think the challenge here is the application of the data set to the tools. Because again, if we're not feeding it with what it's gonna need to be successful, where are we actually going with the tool set? Now we could use large language models and machine learning opportunities to better predict behaviors and to put the right message or to construct the right content and get that into the hands of the individual consumer. But that coordination and collaboration across channels, that understanding has to feed back to somewhere and it needs to be fed with new information. Otherwise that decay is happening so quickly that we're communicating to the wrong people at the wrong time. And it's hard for us to get that same value out of the activity. It's difficult for us to hire new people.
We've seen that across the board. Everybody's struggling with that. And they're really, they're really doing well or they're, finding satisfaction in their investment in AI. But I think that the view of the investment in artificial intelligence is skewed because they go in and I'm to use it as an example, since I'm sitting in the middle, least on my screen. When I go to Mike and I say, okay, How much is it going to cost for me to get these tools together? And Mike's breaking it down. He's saying it's going to cost you X amount for this piece or per call or however that particular tool is structured. But I think where the industry is missing is they're not calculating upfront. At least those that are not satisfied with their AI investments are not calculating the cost of the data increase that they need to put in play in order for them to feel that satisfaction.
So those that are not feeling satisfaction from what I could see in the data was a small subset, but that small subset is only looking at it from a technology standpoint. They're not thinking about it as an operator who needs the technology and the data and the marriage of those two worlds in order to create that success or to find that satisfaction.
Manny Plasencia (20:47)
you want to simplify it, same thing as a dialing file. You go through a file and you get a 2 % contact rate. see it's bad phone numbers. What do you do? You skip trace the file, you get better phone numbers and you dial the better phone numbers and you enhance your data. Why? Because the phone numbers were old, they were outdated and you no longer had a good contact rate because you didn't go and enhance your data across the spectrum and it was easier before because we were calling landlines in 1983. Today you're trying to contact people not just across various channels, but those channels work congruently and they integrate and you're trying to anticipate which channel, you could have a great phone number, terrible email address, great phone number, you're trying to figure all of it and have the best contact because they work congruently. If you want to reach me, you're likely going to have to make different types of, and if we're specifically about contact likely going to have to make different attempts to try and reach me. And if you don't have the right, the right contact information for all of those channels, you're missing a piece of that strategy, which is going to entice me to either answer your contact reply. And like I said, the purpose has changed. ask operators all the time, what's the purpose of a phone call? And they told me to get for an RPC. And I tell them, no, that used to be the purpose of the phone call today. The purpose of the phone call is the same purpose of every communication channel payment. The result.
That's the purpose. You don't necessarily have to talk to people to make, to get payment anymore. But how you know that and how quickly you can get to that determines your margin, which today is pressed more than ever with the higher volumes agencies are facing, the lower liquidation rates and the margins getting squeezed. ⁓ AI is a real solution for those types of problems.
Mike Walsh (22:22)
I think too, Manny, the other thing you're doing on that phone call is asking them how they want to be communicated, right? Like part of what AI does well is that e-commerce, Adam, right? Like the, how do you want to do this? Right? Do you want to do it by text? Do you want to do it by, like, it is just a tool. Phone is just a tool. It's just one way to do it. It is amazing to me though, like when getting back to data is, and what I was going to jump in with is,
Manny Plasencia (22:27)
Thank
Mike Walsh (22:46)
We have a lot of clients and we provide a ton of behavioral data back, right? And they don't use it. can't intake it. And I was like, whoa. And I think some people build or buy a tool and they're like, this tool is great. I get this much more contact rate. And I'm like, that's great. But you could do way better than this, right? And like we're now have.
Adam Parks (22:54)
That's the problem.
Mike Walsh (23:11)
Like I think we've gone through the first rung of AI where people have tried it and yeah, it's better than no AI. And now we're getting into why is your AI better? Show me, right? And it's changed over the two years I've been, or two and a half years I've been at EXL. First it was, trust me, it's going to work. It's, you know, next is, oh wow, it does work. Third is. How is it getting better? Fourth now is how is it better than everybody else? Because let's face it, the market is flooded with tons of things. And part of the thing I think now is that not only the data you put into it, but the data you get back and how that changes and how you can then change your whole process.
Adam Parks (23:55)
It's the same as our other communication channels. When we think about it like this, it is an evolution. But when we talk about, we used to say text message SMS. As if it was just straight up interchangeable because there was a time in which it was. And then the introduction of MMS and how does that have an impact? And I think that's what we're seeing from an AI perspective now. At first it was, let me set up the train tracks that allow me to send a text message.
And then it became, well, how fancy of a train can I put or what order should my cars be in in order to maximize the load that I can move down this train tracks? And I think we're looking at artificial intelligence in very much the same way. But if we're not, what are we sending down the tracks when it comes to artificial intelligence? We build the train tracks and now what are we sending down it? We're sending data.
The data is the navigator there because the train tracks aren't even going to the, if the train tracks aren't going to the right location, if it's not a straight shot from New York to Chicago, are we really accomplishing our goal here? That's where I think the lack of, or really the next phase of our evolution is going to go. If we all have text messaging, okay, let's hear it.
Mike Walsh (25:03)
I agree and disagree with you. Like you're right. That is, but I think now too, it's the data we get back and what do we use, use it for? How do we, and I think I've talked to Manny about this. I think part of what's going to happen is, you know, not everybody has a data analytics team like, you know, EXL does, right? There's a, there, there, there, or a data scientist that can say, okay, we need to look at this, this, and this, because this could affect our bottom line.
But I think the tools for that are being built. is the next, not just of what you've gotten in, what you've increased productivity and efficiency. Now, how do you push it up? How do you take advantage? you know, this is everybody's putting AI into their arsenal, but are you putting it into a armored car? You put it into a tank, right? Like you're going to have to build a better suit, you know, like you're going to have to build a better machine. And that I think is where we're going to go from five years from now. that is, OK, I've done all this. I'm getting this data back. And here's how we're using it. And I think our RFPs are going to say, you're using AI. What's a capable of? What is it doing? And how are you using the behavioral data that comes back?
Adam Parks (26:17)
How are you learning with it? How are you using it to learn and improve your future processes?
Mike Walsh (26:17)
That's. How are you segmenting? How are you strategizing? All right. Like it gives you, as Manny said, what he was trying to do at green sky years ago. It was a perfect idea, right? It's what AI does, but it does it so fast and at such scale. You don't need 40 data analysts to look at it, but you probably need two, right?
Manny Plasencia (26:41)
Yeah, look, I think I talk to Adam all the time, Mike all the time, and I'm, you know, I'm a data geek. can sit here and geek out about information. So I work in the best place in the world, right? I mean, I work at TransUnion, right? I have so much information in my fingertips. It's not funny. Even things like, you know, I'll tell you honestly, I geek out with my buddy over in gaming, you know, table games and Vegas type of gambling stuff. I geek out with him and the way that we utilize that, that I just, you I'm a data guy. So or I'm a data geek. So when you look at the collections industry and what we're trying to solve, What we're trying to solve as an industry for our companies and our strategies are, and I could provide all of this data. How do I reach somebody? But not just how, where, what's the best time? What's the best phone number? This is all setting us up for the most likely success from that communication, whether it be an RPC or a payment, right?
Manny Plasencia (27:30)
Cause you're launching this communication to the best phone number, let's say at the best time of day, because we have all of this very unique information with our acquisition of Newstar, Factor Trust, various other companies. We've all of this very unique data that tells us when the best time and best information to contact somebody is. I could tell you that we want to know how likely, we want to contact in order of the highest likely to pay. Who has the highest propensity to pay their bill? based on their financial behavior or financial information, whether it be based on current information, you know, we have credit bureau information, bank information, you know, all the FCRA permissible stuff, or if it's older accounts, usually, or sometimes in current industries triggers, know, event-based triggers, might get a new job, they might buy a new car, they might do, you know, all of these, you know, I could provide you with all of that information as well. I can tell you. I'm working on this is a really cool new product that we're coming out with and I can share now address behavioral intelligence, digital signals at an address that tell me based on your digital signatures, whether Mike is ordering his door dash. Well, I know whether Mike is ordering his DoorDash at his house or at his buddy's house and based on frequency, time and all of that, could assert that's an active address for Mike Walsh. And I could give you all of that information and I could probably give you. I could sit here and I could go down my product line and make my bosses very happy by talking to you about all the capabilities that TransUnion has. But instead I'll tell you that being able to put all of that together, I made a career out of doing that stuff. I think many of us here have at some point in our careers, right? Now today, I'm not saying that I'm not trying to insinuate the Skynet take over or anything, but you can do a lot, so much more, so much more effectively in decisioning.
Mike Walsh (28:48)
you
Manny Plasencia (29:10)
so much more compliantly. Imagine if you could, know, back in the day, if I could just plug compliance into all of my talk offs, you know, and all of my outreaches. And today you can do that automatically if I could just, you know, and have zero risk. And that decision is what I told it to do. You ever have that frustration, they're not doing what I told them to do? Well, you could just get rid of that. You know, all of it. I'm just saying I've been in, like when I worked at, at eBay especially, you know, being in that, I'll call it,
Mike Walsh (29:28)
Thank you.
Adam Parks (29:29)
You
Manny Plasencia (29:37)
Adam, I'm going to use your phrase, that I was at that intersection of e-commerce and collections, trying to collect at eBay. And having everybody on that one platform and being able have all of those behaviors and seeing the way that e-commerce looked at things versus the way that I looked at things really had an impact on my career. I think it's been obvious since then. look, remember, Guy, I'm going to give him another plug, Dr. James Ward helping us with the, I want to say deploy.
Adam Parks (29:44)
100 percent.
Manny Plasencia (30:02)
artificial intelligence in the EU with integrity and compliance, which was very difficult for us to do. We were doing it across the whole company. So think, you know, the way that people search for products, the way people list for products, photo recognition, things like that. My play was the decision that we were putting into our accounts for civil management programs and how that was working. And working through all of that, that's what led me to, I can do so much more with so much little and be so much more accurate and effective.
And not necessarily, you know, I can, if I want, it could be an FTE play You know, I'm just going to be real. If I want to reduce FTE, I could probably reduce FTE. But what I'm really trying to do is meet the customer where they want to be met. Because I don't want to spend half an hour with your agent having to explain my life situation. I want to go and pay you on a portal, or I want to pay you the portion I want to pay you and when I want to pay you. And I want to be able to negotiate that. And the quicker you can get me to do that, the more successful you are at an agency. And decisioning that is something that I don't do. I don't provide those decisions for you. People like, you know, that's what I love about Mike's partnership with TransUnion, because we can supply them with so much information that, you know, the layman and the agency either can't get, or quite frankly, can't afford in their margins, but you can put together strategies that most people can and help them put together these strategies. It's just finite, love it, it'll be so efficient and effective that just, not only betters our industry, but betters bottom lines, and I love that.
Adam Parks (31:20)
So I want go back to something, Manny, that you said, because as you were talking through kind of this change over time and how things have changed, but I pulled up one of the statistics from the TransUnion Debt Collection Industry Report that we just released. And what I thought was really interesting is there was a 10 % increase between 24 and 25 in the groups that responded that their AI investments were exceeding their expectations. And I don't think that that was, I don't believe that that
Adam Parks (31:47)
large differential was driven just on the change in the tools itself. I think companies are getting smarter at how they're actively deploying it. And if they, like I was saying before, if they start looking at artificial intelligence investment and they start lumping in some of that data change or increase in data or how those data strategies into it, I think it changes the game for them quite significantly. Like that's where the gold is hiding in them there hills.
Manny Plasencia (32:15)
But there's so many different companies out there that can help us support you. like Mike's, what is it? Another statistic that I'll quote from that report is less than 10 % were developing in-house. Every creditors, especially on that front, they were the ones really going out and trying to buy from companies because there's so many companies out there. There's so many people offering different AI tools for you to utilize. And I think it's very important.
Adam Parks (32:27)
And almost no creditors.
Manny Plasencia (32:43)
last soapbox there, I see, and I think I've expressed this to Adam and other folks, I don't think I've talked to you about it, Mike, but look, try to solve your problem. This is my advice to the industry. Look at your problem and think about how you can automate it, even if it seems impossible, but think about how you could automate it, but solve a problem. Don't try to just implement some type of AI products, or you could put it on some type of sales literature and tell your clients you have AI, it won't work. I'm seeing it happen.
Mike Walsh (33:09)
So everybody has another sales literature anyway,
Manny Plasencia (33:13)
And you know what, it's AI, please learn the definition and make sure, talk to somebody in data, make sure that it's not just automation, because you could automate a lot. But there has to be some learning involved, there has to be some large manipulation of data, there has to be decisions that you've actually given away, which are rather challenging to do for folks. I mean, I know if you told me I'm giving away decisioning on how to communicate somebody and I'm not in those dialer meetings every month like I used to be, I'm going to tell you you're crazy, right? But today, if you can get rid of those decisions and trust that those decisions are being made exactly like you said they were, you're just going to be a lot more successful. But AI itself, yeah, learn the definitions and don't just try to join the bandwagon here. Try to solve your problems with these tools and you'll be surprised how successful they are.
Mike Walsh (33:57)
May, it's funny because we haven't talked about this. And the first thing we start with is what outcome are you trying to achieve? Like start with the outcome and then it is, that's what we need to solve for. That's what AI can solve for. If it's an outcome that is based on other external factors, you know, like, especially when you get the customer service and things like that, but maybe we can't, right? Like that, but that's where you start. Collections is, it's just,
Manny Plasencia (34:04)
Best question.
Mike Walsh (34:21)
Customer service is just really hard customer service. That's what I felt.
Manny Plasencia (34:25)
Yeah, look, you just hit the nail on the head. It evolved. Collections has evolved and our tools have evolved over time, but the utilization of our tools have evolved over time. But our decisioning or the tools to decision, the tools to work large sets of data, know, I look at some of these inventories that people are trying to manage, man. It's incredible. And behaviors are now, again, like we said, they were limited to one channel. So everybody kind of behaved the same. Seven o'clock, everybody was kind of eating dinner, prime time, remember? And then came the advent of cell phones, remember? Let's try to catch them on the drive home, because that's really when you handled your business now, you didn't do it at the dinner table anymore. And then we started adapting text messages to that Adam's point, text message and SMS to different things, intended to be a notification, but we decided we're gonna try to collect debt with this, we're gonna write books.
Mike Walsh (34:52)
Yeah.
Manny Plasencia (35:15)
And then regulation wanted to take up half our books, right? And don't get me wrong, somewhere in between, we decided that email is now a viable contact tool and started using that instead of fax machines and things like that, right? So as we've seen this industry evolve and the tools evolve, AI is just the next evolution, right?
Adam Parks (35:15)
We're gonna write books in 30, 150 characters. Yeah.
Mike Walsh (35:23)
We'll do it.
Manny Plasencia (35:37)
There's more debtors than there's ever been. Don't get me in my soapbox about the consumer situation. Just look at the portfolios themselves are larger. Look at student loans. Gosh, whatever that bubble pops. mean, 1.4 billion consumers. Hello. How you gonna work all that debt? Are you gonna throw half the country at it? You're gonna hire half the country in your call center? No, man, you're have to figure out ways to rag models, regulate all that data, get through it. And if you're an agency today and you're not looking at these tools, I love the, where was the line? AI has gone mainstream. It's only 7 % of companies in 2025 saying they don't intend to deploy AI or ML tools, which is down from 27 % in 24. That's a 74 % year over year decline in the non-adopters. And that's from the debt collections industry report. That means
Mike Walsh (36:02)
some ideas on how they work.
Manny Plasencia (36:29)
You're in the 7 % of people that aren't going to have these advantage-giving tools that are going to give your competitors more speed, more accuracy, and the ability to be able to create strategies that we used to dream of only two, three years ago.
Mike Walsh (36:46)
And one more thing, man, scalability, right? Your competition could scale from, literally this is a real world result, 30,000 accounts to 350,000 accounts overnight. know, overnight, not worried, just going.
Manny Plasencia (37:01)
And you can collect payments at three o'clock in the morning, you know, on a Sunday. I love the idea of scalability, Mike, because I truly believe that, you know, if you remember when AI was first introduced, it was, you know, was expansive to buy a large language model. mean, can, it's cost prohibitive. Those obviously with competitors popping into the marketplace that's driven prices down. Now, if you want to implement the large language model and you have the team to be able to do that, no, I
Mike Walsh (37:04)
Correct. 24-7.
Manny Plasencia (37:27)
the gumption will go ahead and do it. can probably afford the tool itself. The thing else is still a little more challenging, but you can probably afford the large language model itself. I think as that continues to grow and adoption continues to increase and we see competitive pricing kind of normalize it and meet the market where it needs to be, it's continuing to give our smaller and mid-sized partners the opportunity to compete for larger RFPs and bids that they wouldn't be able to bid for before being able to work huge account sets now with their 40 and 50 FTE not requiring a thousand or 150 dedicated FTE. They could work larger volumes of accounts. You could be smarter about the way you work your accounts. You could beat your competitors on scorecards all because you're buying better tools. Give me a hammer, a physical hammer. Give me the staple hammer. I'm gonna beat the guy with the automatic hammer every time, right? I don't know, you can tell I'm not a construction guy, but you know what I mean.
Adam Parks (38:23)
So, I have one more thing that I wanted to throw out there from my outline before we wrap up. And I think it's the risks associated with leveraging these tools at scale without improving your data strategy. And one of the things that I've heard through a couple of podcasts that I've done recently was, for example, when we talk about text messaging and we talk about how tightly controlled, for example, RCS is going to be as it even becomes available to the debt collection industry when it comes to email, when it comes to the text messaging, like if we're not putting the right numbers behind it, we're going to start having more carrier problems. Because the more bad emails that I send out, the more spam notifications, the more bounce backs I get, and the less likely Gmail or Yahoo or any of these other more common consumer email systems is to actually deliver my messages.
Manny Plasencia (39:14)
All right, I'll jump in.
Mike Walsh (39:15)
True. Good.
Manny Plasencia (39:16)
One of the ways that I was even introduced to TransUnion and one of the acquisitions that I think was most impactful to TransUnion was the acquisition of Nustar, which I happened about four years ago. The integration of those two companies and the type of data they provide was immense. When you think of TransUnion, you think of a credit bureau, right? I don't know about you, but when I think about credit bureaus, I think about old fussy, musty places.
And TransUnion is the polar opposite. That's why I love working here. So Nustar has very unique contracts with service providers. They owned caller ID way back in the 70s. They still, they own that trademark. And because of that, had very unique relationships with all the carriers. And they've been able to create propensity modeling and scoring based on best time to call, best number to call, all of that and combining the same.
Those types of acquisitions and contact opportunities have always given us the opportunity to expand into other areas and be a little more proactive and forward thinking in what we do and how we do it. How you contact people, when you contact people and how you engage people is really the heart life of our industry, right?
Adam Parks (40:23)
So that was the piece that I wanted to hit was the risks that we run in terms of actually sending these outbound messages to the wrong people is not just a regulatory issue. It is literally the carriers making those decisions. AT &T, Verizon, if we're sending bad text messages, they're not gonna let us send text messages anymore.
Manny Plasencia (40:28)
The risks.
Adam Parks (40:45)
It's a much more tightly controlled animal when it comes to the text messaging channels. And I think when it comes to the emails, it's still a risk.
Mike Walsh (40:46)
Yeah.
Manny Plasencia (40:50)
And there's trusted solutions there that can give you that. There's ways through the carriers, and I'll explain it this way in the most layman term I can think of. There's ways that you can create your blue check like you do on social media to certify that that's you either through caller name optimization on phone numbers, but we call them our trusted call solution subset. you can, the. The way to combat that, because to your point, as an industry, we have to be careful with our behaviors. And I think we've been good stewards of communication channels until now, whether it be through regulatory enforcement or just actually consumer behaviors and expectations. And we're us learning to meet customers where we need to meet them. But the risks we run are severe, right? And it's not just contacting the wrong person, but again, it's also wasting time and money doing so, right? And being able to make sure that you're sending the right message to the right email address, the right phone number, it's just become table stakes at this point. It's not like it used to be where this was a fancy offering. I think that's why we probably didn't bring it up till last minute here because it's table stakes. You need to be taking those types of steps just to protect yourself and be fair to your customer or the consumer you're trying to reach because in today's age you have to
Adam Parks (41:58)
Digital trust.
Mike Walsh (41:58)
I think too, Adam, You can use AI as, like there is an art in science to sending email text messages, right? Again, it's huge data sets. It has to be monitored in real time. Like, yeah, you can send 20,000 texts out and hope for the best, or you can send them out one per minute and monitor what's happening, right? And monitor wait a minute, is this file full of garbage, you know, and we should stop this campaign. we do like, that's what these tools give to you. You can monitor spam filters and like, if you're not doing this, your deliverability rate, you're killing yourself. You're not getting the engagement out to the people you're trying to engage. Manny said it earlier, like this data helps your engagement tool, but. Your process should be now at stable stakes. You should be using the best tools you can to reach customers because frankly, your competition is doing it. The creditors you're getting accounts from, if you're an agency, are doing it. I had an agency manager say, are now software managers. We are software companies. And I think that's true. I think that's where it's coming from.
Manny Plasencia (43:06)
I think it's both, right? Your process is only as good as the data you put into it. And that is only as good as the process.
Mike Walsh (43:13)
Yeah, I agree.
Adam Parks (43:13)
Gentlemen, I can't thank you enough for coming on and sharing your insights with me today. I think we've done a great job of talking not just about the theoretics of what is artificial intelligence and how is it going to impact our business, but talking about how it's actually being applied to the space and how we can improve those applications. So thank you everybody for listening to Applying AI, where we explore how to make artificial intelligence work in the real world of regulated industries. Subscribe to the show.
Manny Plasencia (43:38)
Thanks everyone, bye.
Adam Parks (43:39)
Subscribe to the show on your favorite platform or YouTube and find more insights and resources at receivablesinfo.com. But thank you everybody and we'll see you again next time. Thanks guys, we appreciate you.
Mike Walsh (43:51)
See ya.
Why AI In Collections Is Only As Good As The Data Behind It
Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a major focus for the receivables industry. Collection agencies, creditors, and debt buyers are investing in AI tools designed to improve prioritization, automate outreach, and drive smarter decisions.
But there’s a growing realization across the industry: AI success doesn’t start with technology. It starts with data.
That was one of the central themes discussed in the latest episode of the Applying AI Podcast, where host Adam Parks sat down with Mike Walsh from EXL and Manny Plasencia from TransUnion to explore how organizations can better prepare their data environments for AI-driven collections.
Many organizations assume that implementing AI tools will automatically improve collection performance. But as Mike and Manny explain, AI is essentially an amplifier of the data and processes already in place.
If the underlying data is incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate, AI simply accelerates those problems.
This issue is particularly important in collections because consumer contact data decays rapidly. Phone numbers change, emails become inactive, and addresses shift over time. When that outdated information feeds AI decision models, the technology may prioritize the wrong accounts or recommend ineffective outreach strategies.
For collection leaders exploring AI adoption, the conversation highlights a critical takeaway: data that fuels AI in collections is the real foundation of success.
Without a strong data strategy, even the most advanced AI tools will struggle to deliver meaningful results.
Key Takeaways From The Episode
AI In Collections Acts As An Amplifier
“AI is really an amplifier of whatever data you put into the system.”
AI technology can process massive datasets and generate insights far faster than human analysts. But its effectiveness depends entirely on the quality of the information it receives.
From an operational standpoint, this creates both opportunity and risk. If organizations feed AI systems clean, enriched consumer data, the technology can dramatically improve decision-making and operational efficiency.
If not, it simply scales poor decisions.
Key Reflection:
This concept is something many collection leaders overlook when evaluating AI investments. Technology alone doesn’t create better outcomes. Data strategy does. AI doesn’t fix weak data. It amplifies it.
Data Decay Is A Hidden Challenge For AI Decisioning
“Data decays faster than most organizations realize.”
Consumer information constantly changes. Phone numbers disconnect, addresses update, and contact preferences shift.
That’s why organizations must actively manage data decay when building AI-driven strategies.
Key Implications:
- Outdated data weakens machine learning predictions
- AI may prioritize the wrong accounts
- Outreach strategies become less effective
- Right party contact rates decline
- Operational efficiency decreases
Organizations that continuously refresh and enrich their consumer data gain a major advantage when deploying AI technologies.
Consumer Data Powers Smarter AI Decisioning
“The data is really what drives the decision making.”
AI models rely heavily on consumer behavior signals to determine which accounts to prioritize and how to engage them.
The discussion highlighted how machine learning can analyze:
- payment history
- consumer engagement behavior
- historical contact success
- account characteristics
These insights help organizations determine which accounts are most likely to resolve and when outreach should occur.
Better consumer data ultimately leads to better AI recommendations.
Key Steps To Make AI Work In Collections
Organizations looking to strengthen their AI strategies should consider the following steps:
- Audit existing data quality before implementing AI tools
- Monitor consumer contact data for decay
- Invest in data enrichment solutions
- Integrate multiple data sources for stronger decision models
- Establish clear data governance policies
- Evaluate AI vendors based on data integration capabilities
- Continuously test and improve AI models using updated data
- Focus on improving right party contact rates through better data insights
These foundational improvements can dramatically improve the effectiveness of AI-driven collection strategies.
Industry Trends: Data To Fuel AI In Collections
Across the receivables industry, the conversation around AI is rapidly evolving. A few years ago, the focus was primarily on automation. Today, the focus has shifted toward data readiness and decision intelligence.
Organizations are recognizing that AI technologies require strong data infrastructure to deliver meaningful outcomes. As the industry continues to adopt AI tools, organizations that prioritize data quality, data enrichment, and machine learning readiness will likely see the greatest improvements in operational performance.
The companies that treat data as a strategic asset, rather than simply an operational input, will ultimately lead the next phase of digital transformation in collections.
Key Moments From This Episode
00:00 – Introduction to AI and data challenges in collections
04:30 – Why AI acts as an amplifier of data
11:15 – Understanding data decay and its impact on AI
19:40 – Using consumer data to power AI decisioning
29:10 – Improving right party contact rates
38:20 – Machine learning and account prioritization
43:30 – Final insights and industry outlook
FAQs On Data To Fuel AI In Collections
Q1: Why is data important for AI in collections?
A: AI relies on consumer data to analyze patterns and generate predictions. Without accurate and up-to-date data, AI models may prioritize the wrong accounts or recommend ineffective outreach strategies.
Q2: How does data decay impact AI decision making?
A: Data decay occurs when consumer information becomes outdated. This can reduce the effectiveness of machine learning models and negatively affect collection outcomes.
Q3: How can organizations improve data quality for AI in collections?
A: Organizations can improve data quality by implementing data governance policies, investing in data enrichment solutions, and continuously refreshing consumer contact information.
Q4: How does machine learning help prioritize collection accounts?
A: Machine learning analyzes historical payment patterns and engagement signals to identify accounts most likely to resolve, allowing organizations to allocate resources more efficiently.
About Company
TransUnion
TransUnion is a global information and insights company that provides credit data, analytics, and risk management solutions. The organization helps businesses make better decisions using consumer data insights across financial services, marketing, and identity verification.




